Currently Empty: $0.00
ask the hard question, file the story
You're avoiding the follow-up because you don't want to be the bad guy.
Fine. Be the bad guy with a notebook. The piece doesn't exist without the question you keep skipping, and your reluctance is the exact reason most early-career journalists get scooped on their own beat. The hard question doesn't actually destroy the source relationship — it usually defines it. Sources respect being asked. They mistrust being handled. We talk about source relationships, the difference between rude and rigorous, and the five sentences that get hard answers without making enemies.
Rude vs. rigorous
| Rude | Rigorous |
|---|---|
| Why did you lie | Help me understand the timeline |
| You're hiding something | There's a gap in the public record |
| I have you | I want to make sure I have this right |
| You're a fraud | Walk me through this decision |
The five sentences that get answers
- I want to make sure I have this right.
- I'm seeing X in the record. Help me understand.
- What would you say to someone who says Y?
- Is there context I'm missing here?
- I'm going to publish this — I want to give you a chance to respond.
A rigorous question lands harder than a rude one and costs you less of the relationship. Most green journalists confuse the two and skip the question entirely. Don't.
— L.A. Walton, The Book Maven
From the Maven Catalog
- Master Course — Ask Better, Burn Less
- eBook — The Hard Follow-Up
- Toolkit — Journalist's Toolkit
- Planner — Story Pitch Planner
Ask rigorously, not rudely. Use the five sentences. File the story. The source will mostly survive. So will you. So will the piece.